Jan Fields ([info]cute_n_cranky) wrote,
@ 2009-06-15 11:27:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend  Next Entry
Platform
I've been hearing a lot about platform lately from children's writers (most of them fairly early in their careers). And I've been considering "platform" for the standard, garden variety children's writer.

Platform for a writer means the value of your name in marketing. This means do you personally have a fan base who will buy a book just because it has your name on it. James Patterson had platform (which is why someone published the blindingly bad Christmas picture book he wrote). Jan Fields does not have platform. The folks who recognize my name are not the same people who are likely to buy children's books JUST because my name is on it.

And I still firmly believe children's writers don't have to have platform to get their first book published. On top of that, I've seen not one jot of evidence to suggest that platform is necessary or even important to selling your first book.

Does this mean I think publishers don't like authors to be proactive about selling the book. Do I think this means I think your publisher would rather you DIDN'T do school visits, author talks, writing conferences, blogs, a website, etc. NO, I certainly do not believe this. I think all of those are great things to do when your book comes out. Heck, I think turning your car into a bat to sell BATS ON THE BEACH was a brilliant thing for Brian Lies to do and I think he's the cat's meow. His marketing efforts combined with a FANTASTIC picture book worked together to put him on the New York Times Bestseller lists and that does offer him some platform (though really, the bats might have more platform with actual kids.) Did he do any of this before he got published? Uh, no.

These are "after the sale" things and over time you can get some "platform" out of them. That's because platform is really all about you. Is there something about your name that sells books? If there is...sure, you're going to be that much hotter a commodity, but for a children's writer, the way to get your "name" to sell books is to write a lot of excellent books, sell them one at a time to good publishers, and then do the standard things to support each book until one day you wake up and people know your name.

People chasing platform before the sale are probably just investing time that is better used elsewhere. Children's book buyers are probably not going to know your name until you sell some books (unless you're building platform by winning American Idol or starring in the next Twilight movie).

Within a very limited sphere, I have name recognition...but that doesn't matter a scrap to children's book editors. For me to sell a book, I still have to write a good book that an editor will believe in. Same as everyone else. And from that step forward, I will be building a useful platform, not by chasing platform, but by doing what writers need to do -- write the best books they can.



(8 comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]teriegarrison
2009-06-15 04:40 pm UTC (link)
I seriously think some folks mixed up the concept of 'media platform' (that is, having a website and so on) with the concept of 'platform'.

Yes, prospective publishers do like to know that if they take an author on, the author is prepared to do a certain amount of the marketing stuff.

But no, you do NOT need a platform-platform before you get a kids' book deal. Or else most of us wouldn't be published!

And as I tried to point out in that conversation, many folks who end up with platform (like my friend whose memoir I co-ghostwrote) got the platform from the book, not vice versa.

(Reply to this)


[info]kellyrfineman
2009-06-15 04:57 pm UTC (link)
I completely agree. The only first-time kid authors who are helped by platform might be folks trying to get a nonfiction book published, in part because nonfiction books typically benefit from platform.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]cute_n_cranky
2009-06-15 05:07 pm UTC (link)
Well, dang...I wrote a post and then accidentally deleted it. I'm such a dope. Sigh, I'm going to go write Robinson Crusoe now.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]susanwrites
2009-06-15 09:47 pm UTC (link)
But Kelly, don't you think that all the effort you have put into building your online platform as a poet is going to help you when you are ready to submit your Jane book? I certainly do.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]kellyrfineman
2009-06-15 11:50 pm UTC (link)
I'm hopeful, I suppose, but it won't help me sell books to the world at large, which was how I understood Jan's point.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]susanwrites
2009-06-16 12:04 am UTC (link)
I guess the way I see it is WHEN your Jane book sells, people interested in the topic, in poetry, in Jane, are going to to want to read your thoughts on it all and there you go, all that work done. They will tell people and those people tell people. I still think it will help. But I have my Pollyanna hat on today. :)

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]susanwrites
2009-06-15 09:46 pm UTC (link)
I'm going to come at it from the other side for discussion's sake.

Will having a platform find you an agent or get you a book deal or bring you everlasting love?

Maybe. At least for the first two.

Greg Pincus of the blog, Gotta Book, got a two book deal as a result of building his blog platform (poetry) before he was ever published.

Authors have had editors request manuscripts, have gotten into closed houses, have landed agents, gotten freelance work, all this sort of thing and more as a result of developing a brand for themselves online. Some of these people were published. Some were not.

You don't build a following on a blog or anywhere online overnight. If you wait until your book is out before you build your online prescence you are behind the 8 ball, so to speak, because it is going to take you time to build up your following, to get know, etc.

I don't think a writer at any stage should spend the majority of their time building a brand platform but I think ignoring the idea of it in this day and age is the wrong choice. My two cents. Your mileage may vary. ;)

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]teriegarrison
2009-06-17 07:16 am UTC (link)
The problem is spending a whole load of time building a platform (and we're talking about 'platform' here, not 'media presence', which some folks like to call 'platform') when that time is better spent writing. Really, platform isn't something you build to sell a book; platform is something that happens in your life that might make it easier to sell a book should you happen to write one.

In the discussion Jan is talking about, people were going on at great length about how, if you want to sell your book, you gotta build a platform. That's putting the cart before the horse. Stephen Hawking became a premier scientist, and he ended up with a platform for his scientific books written for laymen. I doubt that, as a freshly minted PhD Dr Hawking said to himself, 'Hey, I want to publish books for laymen so I'm going to build this great science platform.'

One doesn't become a recognised expert in a field in order to sell book; becoming a recognised expert has the side effect of building a platform that might well allow the expert to sell books.

When you look at some of the best-known and best-loved children's writers, not one had a platform. JK Rowling. Jacqueline Wilson. Bruce Coville. Darren Shan. RL Stine. Lemony Snicket. Barbara Danzinger. Stephanie Meyer. Philip Pullman. And so on. What they did was write books.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


(8 comments) - (Post a new comment)

Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…